What may the chair of the ASET Practice Review Board suggest after meetings?

The chair of the ASET Practice Review Board may suggest changes in procedures regarding registration and discipline after meetings because this aligns with the board's role in overseeing and ensuring that the professional standards and regulations are upheld. The board's focus includes evaluating current practices, identifying areas for improvement, and recommending updates to processes that govern the registration of practitioners and the disciplinary actions that may be necessary in cases of misconduct or non-compliance with the established standards. This role is crucial for maintaining the integrity of the profession and protecting public interest, ensuring that all members adhere to the code of conduct and ethical guidelines set forth by ASET.

The other options do not directly relate to the core responsibilities of the Practice Review Board. Suggestions regarding member fees, leadership structure, or education requirements typically fall outside the immediate purview of the board's mandate, which is primarily focused on practice review and standards.